Call for WAEA & CAES Selected Paper Submissions

The WAEA and CAES are excited to invite you to be a part of the program for the 2016 joint annual meetings of the Western Ag Economics Association and the Canadian Ag Economics Society this June 21-23rd in Victoria, British Columbia.

The website for selected paper submission is now live at: 

https://editorialexpress.com/caeswaea2016/

Please be careful to select whether you are a WAEA or CAES member using the dropdown box when you begin the submission of your paper (after the initial screens asking for your personal information).

There is one change in the information that details how to prepare your proposal in the Winter Newsletter---the deadline is now February 17, 2016.

More information is available at:

http://www.waeaonline.org/UserFiles/file/WAEAWinter2015Newsletter.pdf

Food Safety and Nutrition (FSN) Section Track Sessions

 

Modeling Current Issues in Food System Analysis

This session examines four presentations from a variety of lenses in food and agribusiness management. The common threads among them are consumer preferences, prices, and information dissemination/acquisition. Each paper uses a different data source, a different analysis approach, and a different food policy issue. The discussant will assimilate the papers into common themes and we hope for lively audience participation in the time allocated for discussion.

Speakers in this track session are:

• Chen Zhen, RTI International: Food Access and Prices: Estimating Food-at-home Demand
• Jane Kolodinsky, University of Vermont: GM Labeling and the Use of the Word “Natural” 
• Karen E. Lewis, University of Tennessee: Analyzing the Determinants of Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Soft Drinks Labeled with Calorie and Sweetener Information 
• Christiane Schroeter, Cal Poly-San Luis Obispo: A Dynamic Model Estimation of Tax and Subsidy Impacts on Obesity

Christiane Schroeter of Cal Poly- San Luis Obispo will be the moderator. This session is co-sponsored by the Econometrics Section and will take place on Monday, July 27th between 9:45 AM and 11:15 AM in Sierra I. Don’t miss this session, it promises to provide some interesting insights into various controversial topics.

Hunger Relief Programs: Exploring Methods to Improve Food Access

In this invited paper session, we will explore hunger relief programs in the U.S. and consider these programs as an important area of research for applied economists. The session will highlight the importance of the food bank network in meeting food needs of persons who are food insecure. We will identify areas to improve the efficiency of hunger relief programs, and we will also address methods to improve the nutrition of the offerings of these programs. The papers reflect ongoing research from behavioral economics to supply chain analysis. In the session, we will engage the members of the AAEA and WAEA in research opportunities at food banks and their agencies.

Speakers in this track session are:

• Norbert Wilson, Auburn University: Hunger Relief Programs and Behavioral Economics: An Introduction
• Robert King, University of Minnesota: How Healthy Is Hunger Relief Food? 
• Miguel I. Gomez, Cornell University: Improving Food Bank Gleaning Operations: An Application in New York State

Ginny Sorensen, Education and Training Programs Manager of the Oregon Food Bank will be the moderator. This session is co-sponsored with the Senior Section and will take place on Monday, July 27th between 1-2:30 PM in Salon 1.

Children’s food choices throughout the day: Looking beyond the school lunchroom

Although multiple initiatives are already underway to try to manipulate children’s food choices in elementary and secondary school lunchrooms, there remains a concern that healthful lunchtime choices might be counteracted by compensatory behavior at other times of day. Children and adolescents have remarkable spending power, both potential and actual. However, most traditional research has ignored the economic activity and decisions of these young consumers, with only a few exceptions. More generally, the process by which children make food-purchasing decisions is not well understood, despite evidence that children have considerable autonomous purchasing power, and that much of it is directed toward food. Those few studies that do exist suggest that the bulk of this autonomous food purchasing behavior is directed toward energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods (e.g., Borradaile et al. 2009, Wang et al. 2007).

Speakers in this track session are:

• Monika Hartmann, University of Bonn, Germany: Children’s purchase behavior in the snack market: The role of internal and external factors
• Drew Hanks, Ohio State University: School lunches and daily calorie intake 
• Sean B. Cash, Tufts University: Using price promotions to encourage healthier snack purchases by children in corner stores

Studying this behavior across a variety of food environments is crucial to understanding the total impact of environmental influences upon children’s dietary and health outcomes. This session reports on the results of three novel studies using very different approaches to understand children’s food choice and consumption patterns: dietary recall studies on what children eat throughout the day, children’s responses to snack food brands in choice experiments, and children’s responses to food price interventions in convenience stores.

Helen Jensen of Iowa State University will be the moderator. This session is co-sponsored by IBES. It will take place on Monday, July 27th between 2:45 PM and 4:15 PM in Sierra H. Make sure to stop by for this session- we look forward to seeing you!

Including Subjective Beliefs in Empirical Models of Choice and Preferences:  Methodological and Food Policy Implications

Agricultural economists estimate WTP for product attributes or policy options routinely. But what kind of inference can be drawn from such estimates? A decision not to pay premium prices for organics may indicate a low valuation of environmental or health outcomes (i.e. preference). Or, it could be that the consumer does not believe that organic production will deliver such outcomes (beliefs, see Lusk, Schroeder, and Tonsor 2013). As many outcomes associated to labeled attributes (or policy alternatives) are credence in nature, many consumers’ decisions are based on both preferences and beliefs. Without accounting for beliefs, researchers cannot understand what exactly consumers are trying to buy with their food dollars, and policy recommendations based on confounded WTP estimates may be misguided. The debate over the inclusion of subjective beliefs in models of choice has just started in the food economics literature, and many issues remain unresolved. Several belief elicitation methods have been proposed, including likert scales, the probabilistic quantification of the likelihood of an outcome, or indirect experimental approaches (see Costanigro, Deselnicu, and Kroll 2014). Another important problem relates to how to address (or avoid) endogeneity in regression models including subjective beliefs as right-hand-side variables. The session is comprised of four papers presenting alternative methods for belief elicitation and approaches to econometric estimation.

Speakers in this track session are:

• Jayson L. Lusk, Oklahoma State University: Measuring beliefs about expected prices: Reference-Dependent Decision Making when the Reference Price is Uncertain
• Marco Costanigro, Colorado State University: Consumer Preferences for Chianti Geographical Indications Controlling for Taste Expectations 
• Gregory Howard, East Carolina University: Perceived Program Effectiveness and Farmer Preferences for Agricultural Incentive Programs 
• Yuko Onozaka, University of Stavanger: Including Subjective Beliefs in a Model of Salmon Consumption: a Random Matching Approach

In addition to highlighting the pros and cons of each approach, we expect the discussion to focus on how accounting for beliefs can augment and improve the conclusions drawn from surveys and choice experiments. Brian Roe, Ohio State University will serve as the discussant. The session is co-sponsored by FAMPS and will take place on Monday, July 27th between 2:45 and 4:15 PM in Sierra K.

Costs and Consequences of Recent Legislation Affecting Dairy and Food Safety

This organized session will focus on impacts related to parts of two key pieces of legislation, namely, the Dairy Title of the 2014 Farm Bill, and the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2011. Specific focus will be given to how the new regulations and policies will be implemented, projected costs, and other implications for US farms, food processors, and other agribusiness. The potential implications of these policies on the profitability and risk of farms and smaller-scale agribusiness firms will be of particular focus.

• John Bovay, ERS-USDA: Implementing FSMA Produce Rules: Cost Variation by Commodity and Region
• Kathryn Boys, NC State University: Foreign Supplier Verification Requirements: FSMA's long reach into international food and feed markets 
• Marin Bozic, University of Minnesota: The Analysis of Dairy Margin Protection Program Adoption Decisions Using Administrative Enrollment Data. 
• Fanda Yang, University of Minnesota: Understanding Dairy Farm Financial Risk

Martha Sullins of Colorado State University will be the moderator. This session is co-sponsored by ARA and will take place on Monday, July 27th between 4:30 and 6 PM in Sierra E.

Understanding and Analyzing IRI Scanner Data

Government agencies and academic researchers are increasingly using proprietary commercial data on point-of-sale and household food purchases. Previously, many high profile research projects conducted in collaboration with the USDA Economic Research Service (ERS) relied on Nielsen Homescan household-based scanner data spanning the years 1999-2010. However, ERS has more recently begun acquiring more extensive data from IRI including household-based scanner data (Consumer Network), retail scanner data (InfoScan), detailed nutrition data at the UPC level, and health and wellness data for a subset of the households (RxPulse and MedProfiler) spanning the years 2008-2013. With the availability of these new data, it is important to understand the characteristics and statistical properties of the data because these may have important implications for interpreting analysis results. Furthermore, it is now possible to conduct more extensive analyses than in previous years. The purpose of this session is to present and discuss analyses examining the properties of the data and results of initial analyses.

Speakers in this track session are:

• Christiane Schroeter, Cal Poly- San Luis Obispo: Using IRI Household Data: An Application to Produce Purchasing Behavior and Health Outcomes
• Chen Zhen, RTI International: Do Differences in Reported Expenditures between Commercial Household-based Scanner Data and Government Surveys Matter in a Structural Model of Food Demand? 
• David Levin, USDA/ERS: Product Entry and Exit: Evidence and Nutrient Content Implications 
• Kristen Capogrossi, RTI International: Differences in the Estimated Value of Health Labeling Statements to Consumers between IRI and Gladson Nutrition Data: Breakfast Cereal and Soup

Carlos Carpio of Texas Tech University will be the moderator. The session is co-sponsored by GSS and will take place on Monday, July 27th between 4:30 PM and 6 PM in Sierra H.

These presentations will be of great value to graduate students and to food policy researchers who would like to gain an understanding of how the data may be used to address a broad range of research questions.

Acing the Race to Tenure: A Forum on Publication and Career Strategies

Applied economists usually begin their first academic jobs well-equipped with many tools and methods for evaluating economic issues. However, navigating the many aspects and demands of the Tenure-track Assistant Professor position can be daunting. Being successful in the field requires evaluation through peer-reviewed publications as well being able to balance commitments in other facets of the job. Delivering award winning teaching, securing external grant funding, supervising multiple graduate students, can easily turn from career boosting opportunities into costly time sinks. Not to mention the ‘oh so’ important engagement in committee work. The ability to say ‘no’ at the right time and a clear early-career strategy can pave the way to getting Tenure. This track session brings together early-career and experienced members of the academic community to provide tips, share experiences, and discuss how to ‘Ace the Race to Tenure.’

Speakers in this track session are:

• Sven Anders, University of Alberta: “Spreading it thin”- Managing projects and other time sinks
• Lisa House, University of Florida: Strategies for successful teaching and grant writing 
• David Just, Cornell University: Publishing inside and outside of your field 
• Wade Brorsen, Oklahoma State University: Accept or Reject: An editor's insight

Josh Maples of Oklahoma State University will be the moderator. This session is co-sponsored by the Graduate Student Section and will take place on Tuesday, July 28th between 9:45 AM and 11:15 AM in Pacific J. Make sure to stop by for this session- we look forward to seeing you!

Analyzing Food Choices: The Effects of Social Networks, Nutrition Facts in Lunchrooms and Cognitive Abilities

Food choices are influenced by an abundance of determinants. This session sheds light whether and to what extent a relationship between menu labeling, i.e. the posted caloric content of each item next to its price on the menu board, and food consumption exists. One study determines the impact of social networks, healthy eating, physical activity information, and economic incentives on body weight outcomes with the goal to arrive at policy solutions for problems that are inherently based in relatively large, social network environments. Furthermore, the role of cognitive developmental measures in predicting children's response to food prices, warning labels, and other attributes is investigated.

Speakers in this track session are:

• Carola Grebitus, Arizona State University: Analyzing Social Network Effects on Students’ Food Choices in School Lunchrooms
• Christiane Schroeter, Cal Poly- San Luis Obispo: Do Social Networks Improve the Effectiveness of Incentive-Based Health Programs? 
• Sean B. Cash, Tufts University: Children's cognitive abilities and food choices

Helen Jensen of Iowa State University will be the moderator. This session is co-sponsored by FAMPS. It will take place on Tuesday, July 28th between 1 and 2:30 PM in Sierra B. Make sure to stop by for this session!

Food Safety as a Global Public Good: Recent Advances in Strengthening the Foundation for More Effective Food Safety Management Around the World.

This session will look at several research and policy efforts designed to create the empirical foundation and policy support needed to manage foodborne disease as a globalized risk. The session will have 4 talks, 3 on research and 1 providing perspective on the forthcoming UN statement on food safety and nutrition followed by a discussant. Laurian Unnevehr will discuss recent efforts by the FAO/WHO to recognize the role of food safety in international nutrition policy as part of the Second International Conference on Nutrition. This effort will result in the first new declaration on nutrition policy actions in twenty-two years supported by member nations of the UN. Sandra Hoffmann will present results of a large multi-national research effort organized by the WHO designed to provide the first global estimates of the incidence and burden of foodborne disease. This effort provides regional estimates that are globally comparable and link foodborne disease to specific food exposures, and creates a foundation for risk-based country-level interventions. Clare Narrod will present research developing metrics for evaluating the effectiveness of the Joint Institute for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition training programs designed to build capacity to manage food safety in developing countries as well as the metrics approach being used to evaluate coordinated investments in food safety capacity under the World Bank’s Global Food Safety Partnership. Kevin Chen will present research on China’s new effort to strengthen food safety regulation that provides an important national-level example of institutional development and investment in strengthening food safety institutions.


Speakers in this track session are:

• Sandra Hoffmann, USDA Economic Research Service: WHO’s First Global Estimates of Foodborne Disease: What Are They and What Might They Mean for Food Safety Policy.
• Clare Narrod, U. of Maryland, JIFSAN: Building Capacity to Assure Food Safety in Low Income Countries: Progress Report on JIFSAN’s Training Initiatives
• Kevin Chen, International Food Policy Research Institute: Food Safety Regulatory System in China: Key Elements for Improving Regulatory Effectiveness.
• Laurian Unnevehr, University of Illinois: The Role of Food Safety in the FAO/WHO Second International Conference on Nutrition

Our discussant, Helen Jensen, Iowa State University, will provide a perspective on how these and other efforts are likely to affect the ability to manage food safety risks around the world. The session is co-sponsored by FAMPS and will take place on Tuesday, July 28th between 2:45 and 4:15 PM in Sierra K.

Advancing Behavioral Methods for Assessing Consumer Demand:Applications to Food Safety and Animal Welfare

Agricultural and applied economists are continually challenged to assess the value consumers ascribe to key credence attributes attached to food. These attributes, which include safety, nutritional and locational aspects of food, draw on preferences that may be particularly difficult to assess as these preferences may be particularly sensitive to the amount, type and format of information provided and, hence, sensitive to any cognitive anomalies associated with the burgeoning field of behavioral economics. The papers in this session apply and expand existing methods of assessing consumer preferences for credence attributes of foods that may be particularly subject to behavioral anomalies, including the role of patriotism in assessing preferences for food safety, the role of retail outlet in evaluating food safety information and the role of order effects in assessing the demand for animal welfare certifications.

Speakers in this track session are:

• Brenna Ellison, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Are All Organic Labels Treated Equally? The Influence of Retail Outlet on Consumer Perceptions of and Willingness-to-Pay for Organic Tomatoes
• David Ortega, Michigan State University: Chinese Demand for Pork and Implications for the US Pork Industry: Experimental Results from Mainland and Hong Kong Consumers
• Ying (Jessica) Cao, University of Guelph: Order Effects on the Prediction of Consumer Behaviors in Repeated Choice Experiments

Wuyang Hu, University of Kentucky, will be moderator and Brian Roe, Ohio State University, will be discussant. This session is co-sponsored by IBES and takes place on Tuesday, July 28th between 4:30 and 6 PM in Sierra J. Don’t miss this session, as it will provide some interesting insights into consumer demand.

Senior Section Track Sessions

The Future of the CGIAR

The early CGIAR (international agricultural research) centers played a key role in the Green Revolution, developing high yielding varieties of rice and wheat that responded well to the post-WWII decline in the price of nitrogen fertilizer. The resulting productivity growth of these and other crops staved off starvation by lowering food prices and raising incomes of small farmers and farm workers. The CGIAR research outputs made major contributions to post-WWII economic development. These successes led funding agencies to the mistaken conclusion that global food security was no longer an issue and by the late 20th century public sector funding in both developing and developed countries began a gradual decline.

The price spikes of the mid and late 2000s reminded the world that food security was not in fact assured. The expected population and income growth in developing countries and the realization that climate change would pose a growing threat to agricultural production caused donor agencies to review their support for agricultural research. They struck a bargain with the CGIAR institutions, promising (and ultimately delivering) a substantial increase in funding if the CGIAR would restructure itself to be more effective in a rapidly changing global agricultural environment. It is now generally accepted that the initial efforts at reform were less than successful and a second round of reform efforts is underway.

This track session, co-sponsored by the AAEA Latin American and Senior Sections, is organized as a panel discussion to provide an opportunity for attendees to learn about the recent history of the CGIAR, its attempts to reform, and the state of the latest reform efforts. The panel, moderated by Gerald Nelson, Professor Emeritus, University of Illinois and former senior research fellow at IFPRI, includes Karen Brooks, leader of one of the new CGIAR research programs, Prabhu Pingali, former director of economic research at one of the CGIAR centers, professor at Cornell and head of the newly created Tata-Cornell Agriculture and Nutrition Initiative, and Philip Pardey, Professor at the University of Minnesota and one of the leading thinkers in the economics of agricultural research investments. Although the final plans for CGIAR reform are still being developed, the panelists will be knowledgeable about the proposed alternatives and the prospects for future international agricultural research.

This session will be a great opportunity to look into the future of a major international agricultural research institution. The session will be held Monday afternoon, July 27, 1:00 PM in room Sierra J.

The Role of the Developing Countries in Shaping the Future of the Global Trade System

The post-war era of leadership of the multilateral trade system by the US, Europe, Japan and Canada has come to an end. The future of the trade system will increasingly depend on the active participation of emerging countries such as China, India, Brazil, Russia, Indonesia, Korea and South Africa. Moreover, the developing countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America will also play an important role in building a trade system that meets their needs. Developed countries remain crucial to reaching agreement on new trade rules and up-holding current agreements, but these countries can no longer determine the agenda alone.

The sorry state of the WTO Doha Round underlines the ennui that surrounds the multilateral trade system. The action has moved to mega-regional agreements, and countries that previously had preferential access into the European market now are aggregated into Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) with the EU. Developing countries face the dilemma of choosing whether to participate and which Partnership to join. Regions where no such partnerships exist face additional problems of access into major markets.

How the emerging and developing countries respond to these tectonic changes in the world trading system will have major ramifications for agricultural as well as manufactured trade.

• Will the trend towards open markets, with tariffs bound and reduced and subsidies constrained continue into the future?
• Or will the need for policy space (for food security and rural development) lead to a weakening of the constraints on agricultural and food policies?
• Can the mega-regionals deliver open market access and subsidy limitation?
• Or will they find it necessary to take a pass on sensitive domestic issues relating to agricultural programs?

This track session, co-sponsored by the International and Senior Sections, is designed as a panel discussion to elucidate these questions and provide tentative answers from the viewpoints of each of the major regions of the developing world. These five expert panelists are Will Martin from World Bank, Gopinath Manisamy of the Economic Research Service, Alberto Valdes at Catholic University of Chile, Paul Brenton from the World Bank, and Peter Timmer from the Center for Global Development. The panel discussion will be moderated by Tim Josling with the Freeman Spogli Institute, Stanford University.

This session is highly relevant to current events in the international community with implications for U.S. trade. Don’t miss this opportunity to learn more. This session will held Tuesday, July 28, at 4:30 PM in room Sierra F.

Immigration and Agricultural Labor

Farm labor in the United States is made up of approximately 1.1 million workers and has been relatively stable for at least the past decade. Immigrant labor is an important component of many, if not most, agricultural enterprises. The 2010 Population Survey estimates that 57.2% of the agricultural hired labor force was foreign-born. Approximately 62% of those foreign employees worked in crop production, while the remainder worked in livestock. Moreover during the past decade, approximately half of the farm labor force was made up of undocumented workers. The preponderance of undocumented workers in the farm labor force has made immigration policy a major issue for agriculture.

Presentations will examine whether or not the recent slowdown in Mexico-US migration to fill farm jobs is likely to persist and how U.S. agriculture is responding to the end of farm labor abundance.

• Philip Martin, University of California at Davis, will provide an overview of the current border issues and their implications from labor availability.
• A national survey of U.S. dairy farms will be analyzed by Flynn Adcock, Texas A&M University to determine the importance of hired immigrant labor to U.S. milk production, the effects of immigrant labor losses on U.S. milk production and herd size, and the economic impacts on economic output, income and employment in the U.S. dairy sector and supporting industries.
• The third presentation by Juan Murguia, North Dakota State University, uses laboratory experiments to better understand the causes of agricultural and non-agricultural labor market discrimination in Hispanics job-seekers.

You will not want to miss this track session focusing on an issue of high interest and relevance to our nation’s food production systems. This session, co-sponsored by the Latin American and Senior Sections, will be held Monday, July 27, at 4:30 PM in room Sierra K.

Measuring Wealth for Developing and Evaluating Rural Development Policy and Strategy

What is the role of wealth in determining the economic health of rural communities? This track session, co-sponsored by the CRENET and the Senior Section, will focus on this recent shift in emphasis from income to wealth in rural research and policy. Creating and sustaining wealth is being emphasized in contemporary rural development policy and strategy. The optimal combination of wealth investments has the potential to improve the long-run prosperity, resiliency, and upward mobility of people in rural places. However, what constitutes wealth and how it should be measured in the 21st century may differ from the wealth assets of the 19th and 20th centuries highlighted by John Pender et al.’s 2014 book, Rural Wealth Creation, and Thomas Piketty’s recent book, Capital. Presenters from Louisiana, Idaho, Colorado, and New York will describe their on-going research efforts to measure wealth in rural regions and understand the place-based implications of these wealth assets:

• Measuring United States County-Level Economic Resilience to a Recession: What factors contributed to the ability, or resilience, of some communities to resist a recession and to recover more quickly from it?
• Measuring the Rural Wealth Creation Impacts of Local Food Systems: What progress has been made toward a more formal rural wealth creation approach and developing a set of rural wealth creation metrics associated with local food system initiatives?
• Measuring the Comprehensive Wealth of Communities: Implications of Spatial Equilibrium vs. Disequilibrium: If the assumptions of mobile labor and a fixed land supply are relaxed, will the estimates of rural wealth per capital be biased?

Don’t miss this opportunity to discuss these critical issues about wealth creation and measurement in rural areas. The session will be held Monday morning, July 27, 9:45 AM in room Sierra K.

Responding Successfully to Funding Opportunities

Three key pieces of advice for successful responses to funding opportunities – Look, Read, Respond – are emphasized in this track session, co-sponsored by the Agribusiness Economics and Management Section and the Senior Section.

When funding opportunities are presented in RFPs, timely responses that demonstrate thoughtful and practical consideration of the request can open the doors for greater cooperative efforts that are mutually beneficial. But first you must understand what the requesting organization is seeking. This session will provide insights from a panel with experience seeking external economic analyses and what they see as key benchmarks for successful responses to RFPs.

The session is organized as a panel discussion to provide opportunities for attendees to interact and raise questions. The panel members include:

• Sam Funk, United Soybean Board
• Robbin Shoemaker, USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture
• Nancy Lutz, Program Director, Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate, National Science Foundation
• John Lee, former department head and ERS administrator

Who isn’t interested in successfully responding to funding opportunities to support our programs in applied economics? This session will be a great opportunity to interact with representatives of the organizations that provide these opportunities.

We would also like to extend an invitation to those with experience writing RFPs and reviewing proposals and to those who have successfully responded to RFPs and developed cooperative initiatives to add their advice to the discussion. By sharing our individual experiences, we can make this a particularly lively and beneficial session. The session will be held Tuesday morning, July 28 at 9:45 AM in room Sierra K.